Thursday, July 16, 2026

Democrats grill Todd Blanche on ICE agents at polling sites and Kash Patel’s conduct at attorney general confirmation hearing – live

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Pocket
WhatsApp

Chris Stein

Chris Stein

More than 100 House Democrats on Wednesday voted to slash military aid to Israel, a significant rebuke of the longtime US ally as accusations that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government green-lit genocide in Gaza continue to convulse the party ahead of November’s midterm election.

The amendment proposed by Republican congressman Thomas Massie to a spending measure would have halted $3.3bn in planned aid – much of which would have gone to Israel’s military – but was rejected by a 104-314 vote, with 10 lawmakers voting present. It received the support of 103 House Democrats, or nearly half of the 212-strong caucus, underscoring how sentiment in the party towards Israel and the Netanyahu government has soured since the 7 October attack and Israel’s subsequent invasion of Gaza.

The provision resulted in an unusual split among top House Democrats, with minority leader Hakeem Jeffries and the caucus chair, Pete Aguilar, both saying they would vote against it. In a letter to members, Jeffries called Massie’s amendment “overly broad”, but said he would not formally try to persuade other Democrats to join him in opposition, citing “the strongly held views throughout the caucus in this important area of foreign policy”.

On Wednesday, the House Democratic whip Katherine Clark said she would support Massie’s amendment, saying in a statement “it is clear that the status quo is not tenable.

We should not provide a blank check for military aid to any country that does not comply with US law, interests, and values. The Netanyahu government has failed to meet that standard,” added Clark, the second-highest ranking House Democrat.

Key events

Massie and Khanna introduce sequel to Epstein files act to enable state officials to sue for withheld records

Republican Thomas Massie and Democrat Ro Khanna, the two congressmen who introduced the Epstein Files Transparency Act, the law requiring the Department of Justice to release investigative files on the late child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, introduced a sequel on Wednesday.

The Epstein Files Transparency Act II, Massie said in a statement, “gives standing to state attorneys general, the victims of Jeffrey Epstein and his co-conspirators, and members of Congress to challenge the Department of Justice (DOJ) in court for the DOJ’s failure to comply with the disclosure” of records from the Epstein files.

“Since the Epstein Files Transparency Act was signed into law on November 19, 2025, the Department of Justice has flagrantly and consistently ignored EFTA’s disclosure requirements,” Massie said. “The Department of Justice continues to unlawfully withhold over 3 million Epstein files that should be released to the public. In addition, the DOJ is unlawfully maintaining heavy redactions on the files it is releasing. State attorneys general and victims should have the right to sue the Attorney General of the United States to compel compliance with a transparency law President Trump signed.”

Khanna added: “the DOJ has violated our law, delayed the release of millions of files, botched the redactions, and denied the survivors justice.”

Congresswoman Teresa Leger Fernández, a New Mexico Democrat who joined the effort to get the new legislation passed, accused the acting attorney general, Todd Blanche, who described himself on Wednesday as Donald Trump’s lawyer, of “hiding the truth from the American people and creating even more injustice and trauma for survivors”.

The effort is led in the Senate by Jeff Merkley, an Oregon Democrat, and Ben Ray Luján, a New Mexico Democrat.

A new law is needed, Merkley said, because “those in power continue to side with the Epstein Class and shield abusers from accountability for their horrific crimes”.

source

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Pocket
WhatsApp

Never miss any important news. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Never miss any important news. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Recent News

Editor's Pick