Saturday, April 11, 2026

Pentagon reportedly knew strike on alleged drug boat left survivors – live

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Pocket
WhatsApp

The Pentagon knew boat attack left survivors, AP sources say

The Pentagon was aware there were survivors after a September attack on a boat in the Caribbean sea, but the US military still carried out a follow-up strike, according to a new Associated Press report, based on two people familiar with the matter.

The AP’s sources, who spoke anonymously as they were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly, said the rationale for the second strike was that it was necessary to sink the vessel.

It is still unclear who ordered the strikes and whether Hegseth was involved, one of the AP sources said. Those questions are expected to be discuss at a classified congressional briefing on Thursday with Adm Frank Bradley, the commander who the Trump administration says ordered the second strike, the outlet reported.

Trump administration officials have defended the follow-up strike by arguing that the complete destruction of the boat was the objective and that the Pentagon had internal legal approval to carry it out. Karoline Leavitt, White House press secretary, said in a briefing on Monday: “Adm Bradley worked well within his authority and the law, directing the engagement to ensure the boat was destroyed, and the threat to the United States of America was eliminated.”

Our earlier coverage:

Key events

Lisa Murkowski, a Republican senator, has reiterated that the defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, does not have her support after an inspector general report found he violated departmental policies.

Murkowski, who has been critical of Hegseth, told CNN today:

He had not earned my support at the beginning of the confirmation process, and I had suggested that perhaps we can and should do better … I think many are calling into question some of the actions that we’re seeing out of the Secretary of Defense. There’s just the story today about how his use of the Signal chat had compromised information. That’s not good for any cabinet official, and certainly not the secretary of defense.”

The senator was referencing a new inspector general report that criticized Hegseth for sharing secret information in a Signal chat about a planned airstrike in Yemen – a chat that was exposed when an Atlantic journalist was added to it.

When CNN pressed Murkowski on whether Trump should fire Hegseth, she said, “As I said, I have not supported him in the beginning.”

source

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Pocket
WhatsApp

Never miss any important news. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Never miss any important news. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Recent News

Editor's Pick