Wednesday, February 4, 2026

House Democrat faces federal charges for allegedly stealing $5m in disaster funds – US politics live

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Pocket
WhatsApp

Federal grand jury indicts Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick, Democratic congresswoman from Florida

A federal grand jury has indicted Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick, a Democratic congresswoman from Florida, on charges accusing her of stealing $5 million in federal disaster funds and using some of the money to aid her 2021 campaign, the justice department announced on Wednesday.

The Democrat is accused of stealing Federal Emergency Management Agency (Fema) overpayments that her family health care company had received through a federally funded Covid-19 vaccination staffing contract, prosecutors said. A portion of the money was then funneled to support her campaign through candidate contributions, prosecutors allege.

“Using disaster relief funds for self-enrichment is a particularly selfish, cynical crime,” the attorney general, Pam Bondi, said in a statement. “No one is above the law, least of all powerful people who rob taxpayers for personal gain. We will follow the facts in this case and deliver justice.”

Cherfilus-McCormick has made no statement about the charges on her social media accounts or congressional website, and her office did not immediately respond to a request from comment from The Associated Press.

Key events

Sam Levine

Sam Levine

In a highly unusual opinion, a US federal judge berated his fellow judge with a series of personal attacks, and suggested that the billionaire George Soros had a role in an opinion striking down Texas’s congressional districts.

The 104-page dissent from US district judge Jerry Smith, a Reagan appointee, was issued a day after two of his colleagues on a three-judge panel said the new congressional map Texas adopted earlier this year was likely unlawful because it discriminated against non-white voters.

But much of Smith’s dissent attacked US district judge Jeffrey Brown, a Trump appointee and the opinion’s author, accusing him of deliberately issuing an opinion before Smith had had a chance to write his dissent.

“In my 37 years on the federal bench, this is the most outrageous conduct by a judge that I have ever encountered in a case in which I have been involved,” Smith wrote, going on to provide a play-by-play of his exchanges with Brown as he authored the majority opinion.

“If, however, there were a Nobel prize for fiction, Judge Brown’s opinion would be a prime candidate.”

In a staggering turn, Smith turned his attention to George Soros, Soros’s son Alex and the California governor, Gavin Newsom, none of whom were parties in the case. The name Soros appears 17 times in the opinion.

“The main winners from Judge Brown’s opinion are George Soros and Gavin Newsom. The obvious losers are the people of Texas and the rule of law,” Smith wrote.

Read the rest of Sam’s piece here:

source

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Pocket
WhatsApp

Never miss any important news. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Never miss any important news. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Recent News

Editor's Pick