Monday, September 22, 2025

Bondi goes to war with federal judges in New Jersey over removal of Alina Habba as US attorney – live

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Pocket
WhatsApp

Obama spokesperson dismisses ‘bizarre allegations’ from Trump and Gabbard as ‘ridiculous’

In a statement sent to reporters on Tuesday, a spokesperson for former president Barack Obama dismissed Donald Trump’s “ridiculous” accusation that Obama had committed “treason” in 2016, by directing his administration to reveal, after the 2016 election, that the Russian government had attempted to boost Trump’s candidacy.

Here is the full statement from Obama’s spokesperson, Patrick Rodenbush:

Out of respect for the office of the presidency, our office does not normally dignify the constant nonsense and misinformation flowing out of this White House with a response. But these claims are outrageous enough to merit one. These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction.

Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes. These findings were affirmed in a 2020 report by the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee, led by then-Chairman Marco Rubio.

The statement came after Trump claimed on Tuesday that documents reviewed by his director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, prove that Obama was “guilty”.

But Gabbard’s accusation is based on the false claim that Obama and officials in his administration had suppressed “intelligence showing ‘Russian and criminal actors did not impact’ the 2016 presidential election via cyber-attacks on infrastructure”.

Obama and his administration never made that claim. Instead they made the case that Russia had attempted to interfere in the 2016 election through a social-media influence campaign and by hacking and releasing, via Wikileaks, email from Democratic officials and Hillary Clinton’s campaign aides. That conclusion was borne out by special counsel Robert Mueller’s 2019 report and by a bipartisan 2020 report by the Senate intelligence committee whose members included then senator Marco Rubio.

Speaking in the Oval Office during a meeting with the president of the Philippines, Ferdinand Marcos Jr, Trump deflected a question about Jeffrey Epstein, the late sex offender Trump socialized with for more than a decade, calling the uproar over Epstein “sort of a witch hunt”. He then added the baseless claim that, in 2020, Obama and those around him also “tried to rig the election, and they got caught”.

“The witch hunt you should be talking about is that they caught President Obama absolutely cold”, Trump added.

Share

Updated at 

Key events

Democrat explains why she voted to rename Kennedy Center venue ‘First Lady Melania Trump Opera House’

Congresswoman Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, a Washington Democrat who represents a part of the state that voted for Donald Trump in the past three presidential elections, explained on Tuesday that she voted against a Republican funding bill for the interior department “because it wasn’t a good enough deal for Southwest Washington.”

“It slashes funding by more than half for clean water initiatives in our state and reduces resources for the agencies that maintain our public lands, monitor seismic activity, and run timber sales rural communities rely on”, Gluesenkamp Perez wrote on her RepMGP social media account after the bill passed the House appropriations committee.

But the moderate Democrat who has made her willingness to break with her party a selling point in her conservative district, also felt the need to explain why she first voted for one amendment to the bill that deeply annoyed many Democrats.

The amendment, which was introduced by Republicans, conditioned funding for the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts on one part of the complex in the nation’s capital being renamed the “First Lady Melania Trump Opera House”.

Gluesenkamp Perez, the daughter of a Mexican immigrant who owns an auto body shop with her husband, pointed to other provisions of the amendment that she thought were more important than what the opera house on the opposite side of the country from her district is named.

“I also voted for an amendment that would address timber staffing challenges in Washington and strengthen our military readiness”, she wrote. “Rebuilding rural economies matters way more to me than the amendment also renaming an opera house 2,800 miles away.”

Share

Updated at 

source

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Pocket
WhatsApp

Never miss any important news. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Never miss any important news. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Recent News

Editor's Pick