Friday, July 17, 2026

Democratic senator says Trump speech likely to be more ‘election denialism’ from ‘world’s most famous sore loser’ – as it happened

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Pocket
WhatsApp

A new blog dawns

We are wrapping up here and moving our live coverage of the second Trump administration to a fresh blog, focused on the president’s much anticipated primetime address, widely expected to concern the 2020 election he just can’t admit he lost. Please join us there for updates and analysis before, during and after the speech.

Here are the latest developments as we sign off here:

  • Donald Trump’s wildly false claim that the CHIPS Act, a bipartisan law signed by his predecessor Joe Biden, required firms receiving funding to be run by transgender executives, baffled the law’s author, and set off a scramble to figure out where this entirely untrue claim came from.

  • Rather than wait to react, Democratic lawmakers are getting their pre-bunks of Donald Trump’s expected claims about the 2020 election in ahead of time on social media. Maryland senator Angela Alsobrooks framed her comments in the style of a young person concerned about an elderly relative unable to let go of a favorite conspiracy theory. Georgia senator Jon Ossoff said: “Here’s what’s going to happen tonight: the world’s most famous sore loser will deliver a prime time presidential sour grapes address to pursue his six-year-old grievances about the 2020 election”.

  • Two of the major broadcast television networks, NBC and ABC, reportedly declined to air Trump’s primetime address live, relegating the president’s remarks to their streaming platforms.

  • Senator John Fetterman said he would consider leaving the Democratic party it ever became “the anti-Israel party”, as more than 100 House lawmakers backed halting military aid to Israel over its wars in Gaza and Lebanon.

  • In her first press briefing since returning from maternity leave, Karoline Leavitt said that Trump’s findings about alleged interference in the 2020 election “will shock you,” during his televised address to the nation this evening.

Key events

Trump’s false claim that Biden’s CHIPS Act required ‘transgender’ executives baffles law’s author, and she’s not the only one

Speaking at an innovation summit in Pennsylvania on Wednesday, Donald Trump made a startling claim: the CHIPS Act, the bipartisan law signed by his predecessor Joe Biden, which provided $52bn in subsidies and tax credits to boost the manufacturing of computer chips in the US, required firms accepting funding to be run by transgender executives.

“We had this ridiculous CHIPS Act where you give billions of dollars to a company,” Trump said, “and of course, the standards were so high – if you weren’t transgender, as an example, you didn’t qualify. So they’d get the money, they’d hire, they’d look all over for transgender people to run the company, large portions. They couldn’t find them. They weren’t into the chip making business, I guess, right? They had other things on their mind.”

The president’s claim was startling in large part because it was entirely untrue, as one of the co-authors of the legislation, California congresswoman Doris Matsui noted on social media.

“As one of the architects of the CHIPS Act, let me be clear: Donald Trump is lying,” Matsui wrote in response to video of Trump’s remarks. “He’s deliberately spewing disinformation to incite hatred and divide Americans while attacking one of the most important investments we’ve made in American manufacturing, economic growth, and national security.”

The president’s wildly false claim set off a scramble to figure out what he was talking about, with several competing theories about how he had misread the law circulating online.

The White House has not yet responded to a request to explain the comment, but a look at the text of the law reveals that it does, at various points, refer to a Department of Energy office that was named at the time, the Office of Technology Transitions. Last year, after Trump returned to the presidency, that office, which funds new companies, jobs and technologies, was formally renamed the Office of Technology Commercialization.

Another section of the law says that funding should “give priority to institutions that demonstrate effective strategies to recruit and provide career and technical education to veterans and members of the Armed Forces transitioning to the private sector workforce.”

While no part of the law refers in any way to transgender individuals, the legislation was praised, when it was signed into law in 2022, for a provision that directed the National Science Foundation and the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy to address sex-based and sexual harassment in science, technology, engineering and math departments at universities.

Under the law, millions of dollars was to be awarded, “on a competitive basis, to institutions of higher education or nonprofit organizations … to expand research efforts to better understand the factors contributing to, and consequences of, sex-based and sexual harassment affecting individuals in the STEM workforce, including students and trainees; and … to examine approaches to reduce the incidence and negative consequences of such harassment.”

source

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Pocket
WhatsApp

Never miss any important news. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Never miss any important news. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Recent News

Editor's Pick